Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Arjomandkhah v Nasrouallahi [2018] EWHC B11 (Costs)

Costs decision; refusal to mediate; injunction

Claimant's appeal against costs decision made in Defendant's favour.  Claimant submitted that the costs award in the Defendant's favour should be reduced because, inter alia, the Defendant had refused to mediate. Master Leonard found in the Defendant's favour, finding that the terms on which the offer to mediate was made (which was for the Defendant to bear her own costs (which she could not afford) and accept an injunction) were unreasonable.   Although a decision likely to be confined to its facts, this case may be useful in circumstances where costs decisions are being challenged for an alleged unreasonable refusal to mediate.

More Cases

Subject
Consideration as to whether a failure to respond to an offer to mediate is, in itself, unreasonable conduct which should lead to cost sanctions. Costs awarded to the successful party on an indemnity basis despite failure to mediate.
Subject
Costs decision. Consideration of validity of Part 36 offer and reasonableness of failure to mediate at an earlier stage.
Subject
Indemnity costs ordered on basis that losing party failed to engage with offer to mediate.

accreditations & partnerships