Thinking Under Pressure
Would it interest or even shock you to know, how mistakenly confident we are in our own thinking?
A few years ago, I was mediating a commercial dispute. Two intelligent, successful people. Same contract. Same emails. Same facts.
And yet, listening to them, you would have sworn they were describing entirely different realities.
One said, “They deliberately misled us.”
The other said, “We were completely transparent.”
Both were certain.
Both were offended.
Both were wrong about one thing.
They believed certainty was the same as accuracy.
At one point, I asked a simple question:
“What if you’re not lying to each other—what if you’re just seeing this from different islands?”
Silence.
That moment changed the room. Not because anyone gave in—but because curiosity replaced certainty.
And that is when progress began.
We tend to think mediation is about resolving disputes.
But really, mediation is about how humans think under pressure.
Thinking More Wisely
The same habits that break down dialogue in mediation, break down decisions in the boardroom and quietly shape the outcomes of our lives.
And so, critical thinking isn’t about teaching you how to think harder. It’s about thinking more wisely. Because the most dangerous phrase in business and in life is not “I don’t know.” It’s:
“I’m certain.”
The mediation process of critical thinking and decision making. Of testing reality v perception.
That gap between perception and reality is where disputes are born—and where mediation works.
Critical thinking sounds complicated but in reality, it means thinking about who is telling you something. Thinking about what their motive might be for you to receive this piece of information with this particular spin.
Rather than thinking about the information on its own, asking “What is the reasoning behind wanting me to think or act in this way?”
Who – is telling me?
Can I trust them?
Why are they telling me?
So, if you imagine a headline: “Experts Say…”
Which experts? Funded by whom? With what incentives?
In mediation we don’t ask “Is this true?” We ask:
Who benefits if I believe this?
What happens if I don’t?
That same lens belongs in business strategy and personal decisions and requires the ability to:
Independently analyse information,
Seek out alternative wisdom,
Dig deep into alternative viewpoints,
Understand all perspectives
Key Principles
There are 2 key principles in mediation:
Self-determination - empowering the parties to make their own decisions.
Fully informed consent – encouraging consideration of all relevant and available information in order to decide.
These principles apply in business and in life too and are based on the ability to think critically and to consider a variety of perspectives and options.
For example, a board approves a major acquisition because:
“Everyone else is doing it”
“The market expects it”
But no one asks:
What’s the downside risk?
What’s the alternative?
What if the assumptions are wrong?
That’s not informed consent—that’s groupthink wearing a suit.
What stops critical thinking? Generally, it is fear, including fear of social exclusion or social punishment. Think “Cancel Culture”.
In addition, social pressures such as conformity, group think, our own emotions and bias as well as external manipulation, influence and control can impact our ability to think critically.
For example, you want to speak up in a meeting, maybe you see a flaw in a plan, but you don’t say anything. Why? Not because you lack intelligence, but because you fear:
Looking foolish
Being excluded
Being “that person”
Creating Safety
Mediation trains us to create psychological safety, because without safety, critical thinking shuts down. The mediator’s instinct - pause, invite, listen - is also a leadership superpower.
When parties arrive at mediation convinced that they’re right, every question can feel like an attack and every compromise like a surrender.
But when curiosity replaces certainty
Information flows
Options emerge
Resolution becomes possible
Offers are heard instead of dismissed. Conversations are constructive instead of combative and resolution becomes achievable.
The dispute itself may be complicated. But the attitude parties bring to the table often decides whether it gets resolved.
Helpful Questions
Here a few categories of questions that that can promote critical thinking:
Analysing Assumptions (e.g. "What are the underlying assumptions of this argument?"),
Considering Alternatives (e.g. "What's another way to look at this?"),
Evaluating Consequences (e.g. "What are the larger implications of this decision?")
Questioning Sources (e.g. "How do you know this is true?").
Other helpful questions include those that encourage problem-solving, comparison, and personal reflection.
Critical thinking is not about winning arguments. It’s about:
Pausing when others rush
Asking better questions
Choosing understanding over assumption
We live in a world that rewards speed, certainty, and slogans but mediation teaches us that the most powerful thinkers are not the loudest. They are the most curious.